AR295

Wetting and roughness – What to do if Wenzel does not work?

How contact angle measurements and confocal microscopy can provide an empirical solution

The fact that the roughness of a surface can influence its wetting behavior is well known and described by Wenzel in his theory with a simple equation. But how well can this theory be transferred to industrial practice? We did the test and microstructured silicon wafers very precisely by reactive ion etching, but without changing the chemical structure of the surface and thus its surface free energy.

 

With the help of the Surface Roughness Analyzer – SRA, the microstructure of the surfaces was measured by confocal microscopy to determine the parameters relevant to Wenzel's theory. Contact angle measurements on the differently structured samples surprisingly showed a correlation contrary to Wenzel's prediction. This example shows that a correction of contact angle data, which uses Wenzel's assumptions as sole basis, is not recommended. However, by measuring both roughness and contact angle, an empirical solution can often be found in practice to separately investigate and ultimately predict the effects of roughness and surface energy on wetting behavior.

请输入您的电子邮件地址以获得更多信息
通过提交此在线表格,代表您已同意KRÜSS公司的数据保护规定,我们将存储和使用您的数据来处理您的咨询。KRÜSS可能会将您的数据传递给其合咨询机构进行数据整理,也可能会通过电子邮件、电话或邮寄的方式与您联系,用于广告宣传。您可以在任何时候取消订阅,您可以将此协议寄至KRÜSS GmbH, Borsteler Chaussee 85, 22453 Hamburg, Germany,或发送电子邮件至 info@kruss.de